Updated April 5, 2026 🫧

Made with Framer & Claude Code

Insight Global: An AI-Enhanced Organizational Chart

Context —

B2B SaaS, Design System

Team —

Paul Josel, Jiehui Kwa, Chloe Jung

Stakeholder —

1 UX manager, 1 UX researcher, 1 VP of Product @ Insight Global

Aug 2024 - Dec 2024 (4 Months)

💡 Problem:

How might we optimize the relationship building process for business consultants, narrowing down an ambiguous scope on client acquisition, retention, and credibility?

✅ Solution:

A centralized organizational chart and automated follow-up system for information-sharing transparency and workflow efficiency. 🕸️

Drop New contacts, Internally Transparent across the company

Spotlight Key Accounts, Modify Relationships

MY ROLE

Co-Leading the Design🧑‍🎨, Involved in Research & Testing

In this partnership with Insight Global, I was heavily involved at every stage, from research and ideation to sketches and prototyping. I worked closely with my teammate Chloe to test potential design solutions through various rounds.

POTENTIAL IMPACT

Development in 2025 Q2? 🚧

At the final meeting, our sponsor disclosed plans to develop our organizational chart features in their system. This will serve over 3000 Account Managers in 67 offices across 6 continents!

01 Background & Problem Context

Who are we solving for and what is their stated issue?

BACKGROUND

Insight Global: 5th Largest U.S. Staffing Firm

TARGET USERS

Business Consultants

Business Consultants at IG help hiring managers at Fortune 1,000 companies find candidates to fill open roles.

Acquisition: get business to source talent

Retention: provide aftercare when talents dropoff

THE PROBLEM

A Trend of Declining Trust

Business Consultants face a bad reputation in terms of two key issues: repetitive outreach and a disorganized recruitment process.

02. Narrowing down the Scope 🔍

5 COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING & 4 LITERATURE REVIEW

1. The current practices of the staffing industry are embracing AI.

1.the staffing industry is using AI to automate lead searching.

4 ONSITE SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEW + 1 CRM AUDIT

2. What are users' frustrations related to client transitions or drop-offs?

4 EXPERT INTERVIEW + 1 TASK ANALYSIS

3. Mapping out Task and CRM Opportunities 🕸️

3. Mapping out Task and CRM Opportunities 🕸️

after 4 expert interviews with Account Managers from Palantir, LinkedIn, and Rubrik

After 4 expert interviews with Account Managers from other companies like Palantir, LinkedIn, and Rubrik, I led the team to map out an AM's task flow and identified opportunities lacking in the existing CRM. Opportunities are identified:

DATA SYNTHESIS : EXISTING ISSUES

DATA SYNTHESIS : EXISTING ISSUES

A Lack of Internal Credibility… Scattered Data with Manual Documentation

A Lack of Internal Credibility… Scattered Data with Manual Documentation

SURFACE LEVEL PROBLEMS

🧊 Low CRM usage

🧊 Delayed Follow-ups and Referral Searching

🧊 Repetitive Calling, Overlook of Small to Medium Accounts

Because of….

🔧😫 Scattered across Multiple Tools

🔧😫 Scattered across Multiple Tools

Limited In-House Features: The current CRM does not highlight key decision-makers and historical contracts. Many use HubSpot to track contracts, and ZoomInfo for gathering referrals.

The in-house CRM does not highlight key decision-makers and historical contracts. So, many use HubSpot to track contracts, and ZoomInfo for gathering referrals.

📝😕 Manual, Repetitive Documentations

📝😕 Manual, Repetitive Documentations

Users waste time making organizational charts and manually entering data for reminders and lead tracking. The time piles up when having over 30 clients.

AMs waste time making org charts and manually entering reminders and lead tracking. The time piles up when having over 30 clients.

📊😫 Data Not Transparent

📊😫 Data Not Transparent

Most users don't know what others are working on! There are 3000+ AMs at IG, but no means to name-drop contacts or share findings in the system.

Most AMs don't know what other AMs are working on! There are over 3000 AMs at IG, but no means to name-drop contacts or share findings.

Another challenge at the stage

Another challenge at the stage

After talking to the our stakeholders, I realized that our initial scope was too broad - It's nearly impossible to build and customize a feature-rich products at early stages.

SO……..Validating Assumptions with Stakeholders

Feature Prioritization on Building Internal Efficiency

I facilitated a design workshop and led the team to map out our feature prioritization, which persuaded the team of the value of information-sharing and automated follow-ups.

03. Design Processes

Ideation + Scoping Down Details

Some Explorations of Information Sharing and Follow-Ups

CRAZY 8

Initial Brainstorming

CONCEPT SKETCHING

Sketches + Idea Feedback

3 Sketched Concepts + Feedback Session

Low and Mid-fidelity Wireframes

Wireframe Testings with 4 Account Managers

Intiial ideas

IDEATION FINDINGS

🗣️ Everyone thumbed-up the Org Charts, but needed Visual Clarity in Accounts

Users also requested clearer labeling and distinction to better visualize complex client relationships.

Building the key flows

Aligning with the stakeholder, we prioritized the most important 3 MVP feature user flow based on value and effort.

The VERY FIRST versions of our prototype

Spotlight Key Accounts in the organizational chart

Shared Charts: eliminates manual work and reduces cognitive load.

USER TESTING: Cognitive Walkthrough + Usability Testing

3 Account Managers + 2 Industry Experts

Five participants (n=5) completed four tasks on our prototype. We then compared the time taken and the number of clicks required to complete each task.

Analyzed expert's responses for the usability issues

Coded Evaluations in table form, Rated each each based on degree of severity

Analyzed SUS Questionnaire Results

Synthesized By Affinity Mapping

WHATS CHANGED

After User Testing Iterations

The Final Prototype

Key Highlights:

  • Expandable Contacts: 3 Additional Use Cases for key tasks

  • Breadcrumbs: Reorganized to clarify grouping by companies

  • Cards: Improves scannability and reduces time spent

04. Digging Deeper on Value-Additions

Re-evaluating Use Cases & Digging Deeper

Can AI add value to our use cases?

By thinking about AI's primary value drivers, I identified that business consultants with complex multi-modal data needs would benefit most from:

  • AI Co-Pilot: Suggests priority leads and follow-ups based on engagement history

  • AI Embedding: Automates org chart creation from contacts and emails

Looking at Comparables & Best Resources in AI

What are some patterns that can be adapted?

Use Cases of Embedding AI

Auto-Generation & Suggest Chart Edits to improve work efficiency

Use Cases of Copilot AI

Contact: Next-Step Suggestions

Use Cases of Copilot AI

Company: Follow-Up Template

Use Cases of Copilot AI

Madlibs for Saved Workflow, Automate Manual Process in Switching from Multiple Platforms

Pitching Values, Rather than Pushing for Implementation :

Since our stakeholders have limited AI familiarity, my goal through these designs is to demonstrate the concrete value through practical examples, so that they could easily visualize within our product context.

05. Project Recap:

EFFICIENCY

Faster Task Completion Rate

Faster Task Completion Rate

* ~ 1hr spent on Org Charts to ~ 3m56s

TRANSPARENCY & TRUST

Better Information Sharing

Better Information Sharing

*2 features on spotlighting and sharing key accounts

SATISFACTION

88% Satisfaction Rating

88% Satisfaction Rating

*feedback from 4 stakeholders, 4 AMs on SUS Questionnaire

CONCLUSION

Lessons Learned

Lessons Learned

Working with A Broad Scope but Restricted Access

We have experienced multiple switches between the key points of contact. Additionally, our access to Insight Global's CRM and internal tools like Hubspot has been restricted. We focused on interactions within the accessible parts of the system and validated our findings through market research.

Cross-Reference Data, Prioritize Key Flows instead of All

Throughout the stages of our research, we have cross-referenced our previous findings with newer research. Although we were ambitious to tackle all the insights we've gained, we learned to cherry-pick and prioritize on the key flows that would be the most cost-efficient for the company.

Throughout the stages of our research, we have cross-referenced our previous findings with newer research. Although we were ambitious to tackle all the insights we've gained, we learned to cherry-pick and prioritize on 2 key flow that would be the most cost-efficient for the company.

Show everything with stakeholders

In terms of stakeholder management, it can be more time-saving to show everything and be transparent at every stage of the design process. Stakeholders understand that the design process is not linear, so don’t be afraid to show high-fidelity designs during the ideation stages.